What Content Intent Actually Means for Recipe and DIY Bloggers
Confused by content intent advice? In this post, I wanted to explain what content intent actually means for us recipe and DIY bloggers, using real examples and experience, not SEO confusing wordings.
If you’ve ever been told during an SEO audit or heard from podcasts that a recipe or tutorial has “mixed intent,” there’s a good chance you nodded… and still walked away thinking: “Okay… but what does that actually mean for this post?”
You’re not alone.
Content intent is one of those terms that gets thrown around a lot in SEO conversations. It usually comes up during audits, content reviews, SEO blog posts, and even on SEO podcasts — often framed as something you’re “doing wrong,” without much explanation of what that actually means for your post.
This post is about clarifying how content intent works in real recipes and tutorials, why it’s often misunderstood, and how to tell the difference between a page that’s doing too much and one that’s simply doing its job.
First: Content intent is not the same as search intent
These two get mixed together constantly, and that’s where a lot of bad advice starts.
Search intent is about why someone searched a query: Educational, transactional, informational, etc.
Content intent is about what your page is designed to help someone do once they land there. In recipes and tutorials, content intent is usually very simple:
Help someone successfully make the thing.
That’s it.
If the page fulfills that goal clearly and completely, the intent is focused—even if there are multiple steps, sections, or sub-recipes involved.
Recipes and tutorials usually have ONE intent
In recipe and DIY blogging, content intent usually isn’t fragmented. It’s practical.
A recipe exists to help someone make a specific dish successfully. And a tutorial exists to help someone complete a specific project without guessing or failing halfway through.
That may sound obvious, but it’s where a lot of confusion starts — especially during audits or from SEO articles.
When a recipe or tutorial includes multiple parts, those parts aren’t separate intents. They’re dependencies. The outcome depends on them working together.
Take a recipe like ganache macarons.
The purpose of the post isn’t to teach three independent skills. It’s to help someone successfully make ganache macarons — shells, filling, and assembly included. Each part exists because the final result depends on it.
Where bloggers sometimes run into trouble isn’t the structure of the recipe, but how it’s framed. When sections are written and labeled as standalone how-tos, they can start to look like separate goals. When they’re framed by function — shells, filling, assembly — the intent stays unified, even if you explain each step in detail.
You may teach how to make the shells. You may explain how to prepare chocolate ganache. But the job of the post never changes: helping someone end up with macarons that actually work.
The same applies to something like pie. A crust, a filling, and the baking process aren’t competing topics. They’re required components of the same outcome.
That single outcome is the intent — and everything else exists in service of it. This distinction is what often gets missed when content is evaluated too mechanically instead of functionally.
A single goal may require multiple components. And this is the key distinction most audits miss. Required components are NOT mixed intent. Remove any of those components, and the recipe or tutorial breaks.
A recipe or tutorial often needs sub-sections to function. That does not mean the intent is mixed.
DIY / Craft tutorial example
Let’s say: DIY Wood Sign
You include:
- Supply list
- Wood prep
- Painting technique
- Sealing
- Hanging hardware
Those aren’t separate intents. They’re steps toward the same outcome.
If someone removed the “paint instructions”, the tutorial fails its intent because there wouldn’t be a sign.
So when DOES mixed intent actually happen?
Mixed intent happens when a page starts trying to satisfy another, independent goal that could stand alone without the main project.
Not “sub-steps.”
Not “required explanations.”
But separate queries with their own intent.
Real mixed intent examples:
Marinade posts
- A recipe meant to rank for “chicken marinade”
- Also trying to rank for “how to grill chicken”
- Plus “best cuts of chicken”
- Plus “meal prep ideas”
Now the page doesn’t know what it is anymore.
Someone searching “chicken marinade” doesn’t need grilling lessons.
Someone searching “how to grill chicken” might not want the meal prep.
That’s intent drift.
Generic how-tos
- “How to paint furniture”
- Also ranking for “best paint brands”
- Also “chalk paint vs latex”
- Also “selling painted furniture for profit”
Those are different goals. Each one could be its own page.
That’s mixed intent.
The simplest test (and the one I trust)
When I’m unsure, I use one question:
If I remove this section, can someone still complete the recipe or tutorial successfully?
- If no, it’s a required component.
- If yes, and the section serves a different search goal, you may have mixed intent.
This test cuts through a lot of SEO noise.
Why this matters for bloggers
If you’ve been blogging for a while, chances are:
- You might or might not be accidentally mixing content intent.
- But you might be reacting to audit feedback without full clarity.
- Or second-guessing solid content that already serves readers well
Understanding this distinction gives you confidence to push back when advice doesn’t make sense, defend content that works, and fix real intent drift instead of imaginary problems
My Final thought
Recipes and tutorials are not thin blog posts padded with keywords.
They’re systems.
They have dependencies.
They require context to succeed.
Mixed intent is about competing goals—not necessary steps.
Once you see that clearly, a lot of SEO advice suddenly gets easier to evaluate. And you can actually evaluate your own content and make sure you are providing the best possible content and user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
Look at what the section is trying to help the reader do. If it directly helps them complete this recipe or this project successfully, it belongs. If it starts answering a broader or more generic question that isn’t necessary for the outcome, that’s when intent can drift.
Yes. Ranking for multiple closely related queries is normal when they all lead to the same outcome. A single post can naturally rank for variations as long as those searches are all satisfied by completing the same recipe or tutorial.
Not immediately. First, identify what the audit is reacting to. Often it’s a section that looks standalone but isn’t actually functioning that way. Before splitting or deleting content, check whether the section is required, supportive, or simply framed in a way that makes it appear disconnected.
No. Optional doesn’t mean irrelevant. Many optional sections exist to prevent failure, improve results, or adapt the recipe or project to real-life situations. As long as they support the same final outcome, they don’t create mixed intent.
When a section serves a different goal than completing the main recipe or tutorial. If the section could stand on its own, attract a different audience, and be useful without the original post, it may deserve its own page.
More Blogging Posts To Read
If you enjoyed learning What Content Intent Actually Means for Recipe and DIY Bloggers, you might also love these other blogging-related articles too:
- What Google Considers High-Quality Content. Google’s Quality Guidelines Explained.
- How AI Search Is Changing Blogging in 2026 and How to Help Your Creative Blog Stay Visible
- 7 Must-Have Pages for Your Creative Blog
- Crafting Helpful Content That is Actually Helpful in 2026
Don’t forget to share and save this post!
